Intercultural Communication Patterns in Bugis–Lauje Marriages: Negotiating Identity and Harmony in Rural Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jcrt.1480Keywords:
Adaptation strategy, Bugis–Lauje marriage, Central Sulawesi, family mediation, intercultural communicationAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the intercultural communication patterns between Bugis–Lauje couples in Tinombo, Central Sulawesi. The research aims to understand how these couples navigate linguistic, emotional, and cultural differences in their daily lives, and how traditional rituals and family mediators serve as bridges of meaning to maintain marital harmony. Methodology: The research employs a qualitative case study approach with six purposively selected informants, including two interethnic couples, two family members, and two traditional leaders. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participatory observation, focus group discussions, and document analysis, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model with triangulation and member checking to ensure validity. Findings: The findings show that Bugis–Lauje couples achieve intercultural harmony through continuous negotiation and adaptation. Indonesian functions as a neutral lingua franca in household communication, while Bugis and Lauje languages are used in rituals to maintain cultural identity. Couples adopt adaptive strategies such as humor, patience, code-switching, and family mediation to transform potential misunderstandings into mutual understanding. Rituals like mappacci (Bugis) and modutu (Lauje) serve as symbolic spaces of cultural dialogue, reinforcing kinship ties and social cohesion. Implications: The study makes significant contributions both theoretically and practically. Theoretically, it extends Kim’s Stress–Adaptation–Growth model, Giles’s Communication Accommodation Theory, and Ting-Toomey’s Face-Negotiation Theory within the Indonesian intercultural context. Practically, it proposes policy recommendations such as pre-marital intercultural communication modules at KUA, handbooks for family mediators, and bilingual ritual literacy programs to enhance cross-ethnic understanding in rural communities. Originality and Value: This research makes a novel contribution by focusing on the domestic sphere of intercultural communication in rural Central Sulawesi—an area that has been rarely examined in prior studies. It introduces the concept of a hybrid communication model that merges linguistic, cultural, and emotional elements, illustrating how multiethnic families act as agents of social cohesion in Indonesia’s multicultural landscape.
References
Al-Gazali, M. Y. I. (2022). Interaksi Sosial pada Masyarakat Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Komunikasi Antarbudaya di Kota Tua Ampenan Mataram. JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION, 3(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v3i1.173
Alam, I., Linlong, Y., Kamran, F., & Zhang, C. (2025). Multilingual interplay and the influence of the official languages on the use and transmission of the regional language Pashto: a case study of a Pashtun family in Pakistan. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2025.2506476
Asmal, I., & Latief, R. (2023). The Presence of a Family Communal Space as a Form of Local Wisdom towards Community Cohesion and Resilience in Coastal Settlements. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108167
Barnlund, D. C. (2017). A transactional model of communication. In Communication theory (pp. 47–57). Routledge: Routledge.
Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice ( and W. Holt, Rinehart, Ed.). New York. https://doi.org/10.2307/2776308
Calegare, M., Lopes, K. P., & Zacarias, E. F. J. (2021). The Sense of Belonging of indigenous and non-indigenous dwellers in a Multiethnic Community of Manaus-AM. Estudos de Psicologia, 26(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20210031
Cheong, P. H. (2006). Communication context, social cohesion and social capital building among hispanic immigrant families. Community, Work and Family, 9(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800600743495
Conway, D. (2007). Caribbean transnational migration behaviour: Reconceptualising its “strategic flexibility.” Population, Space and Place, 13(6), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.465
Darmastuti, R. (2013). Mindfulness dalam komunikasi antarbudya pada kehidupan masyarakat Samin dan masyarakat Rote Ndao, NTT. Yogyakarta: Buku Litera.
Dumanig, F. P., David, M. K., & Shanmuganathan, T. (2013). Language choice and language policies in Filipino-Malaysian families in multilingual Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(6), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.784323
Ferreira, J. D. (2016). Linguistic accommodation in the Galician-Spanish bilingual interaction: Discursive strategies of convergence and divergence in sequences of conflict. Tonos Digital, (31), 180–214.
Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15(2), 87–105.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001
Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 281–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hadawiah, H., Sulaeman, S., Nurdin, A., Sulastri, I., & Fitriyani, A. (2025). Cross-Religious Ritual Communication in the Bugis Tolotang, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-025-00517-7
Hafifah Sh, S. N., Hasni, H., & Falihin, D. (2021). Komunikasi Antar Budaya dalam Perkawinan antara Etnik Bugis dan Etnik Mandar Di Desa Lero Kabupaten Pinrang. Social Landscape Journal, 2(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.56680/slj.v2i1.19728
Henriksen, N. (2013). Style, prosodic variation, and the social meaning of intonation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(2), 153–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000054
Heryadi, H., & Silvana, H. (2013). Komunikasi Antarbudaya dalam Masyarakat Multikultur. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 1(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v1i1.6034
Irpan, I., Malabar, S., & Masie, S. R. (2023). Relasi Kekerabatan Bahasa Lauje dan Tialo di Kabupaten Parigi Moutong Dan Relevansinya Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Normalita (Jurnal Pendidikan), 11(2), 404–416.
Kaddi, S. M. (2018). Dialektika komunikasi suami isteri pada perkawinan beda etnik (Studi kasus pada pasangan etnik Bugis dan Kaili di Kota Palu Sulawesi Tengah. Universitas Padjadjaran.
Kesici, M. R. (2025). Economic Impact of Ethnic and Cultural Identities: The Role of Multiple and Hybrid Identities Among Kurdish and Turkish Migrants and Their Descendants in Germany. Social Currents, 12(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965251356283
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233253
Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Stress-adaptation-growth dynamic and intercultural personhood. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), Intercultural communication (pp. 243–257). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0071
Lestari, P. A. (2024). Reclaiming Faith and Justice: A Narrative Review of Islamic Feminism. Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(3), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v2i3.608
Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2016). Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 2). Jakarta: Kencana.
Liu, W., Son, M., Wenzel, A., An, Z., Zhao Martin, N., Nah, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2018). Bridging mechanisms in multiethnic communities: Place-based communication, neighborhood belonging, and intergroup relations. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2017.1384506
Lubis, L. A., Kurniawan, A. J., & Pohan, S. (2020). Komunikasi Antarbudaya dalam Perkawinan Beda Warga Negara. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v18i1.3711
Mahmoud, H. W. (2009). The role of feeling in intrapersonal and interpersonal Ethnic identities. Culture and Psychology, 15(2), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X09102895
Matthew B, M., A.M, H., & Johnny, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage.
Meyer, M., & Fozdar, F. (2022). Complex but ordinary: intercultural negotiations among mixed families in Australia. Journal of Family Studies, 28(4), 1504–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1844039
Mulyana, D. (2015). Komunikasi Lintas Budaya. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya.
Peressotti, F., & Miozzo, M. (2025). Feeling more in the language used among family and friends. Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728925000355
Rahman, A., Arsal, T., & Shintasiwi, F. A. (2022). Local wisdom and strengthening social integration in multiethnic society post-aceh conflict. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.06
Ridwan, M., Sulaeman, S., Nurdin, A., Hadawiah, H., Mustafa, I., & Busro, B. (2025). Ritual Cross-Religious in Moluccas Immanuel Church, Indonesia: Why Involvement of Muslim Communities? Human Arenas, 8(2), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00331-z
Samovar, L., Porter, R., & McDaniel, E. (2013). Communication between cultures (8th ed.) (Wadsworth, Ed.). USA.
Saputro, P. W. (2023). Hambatan komunikasi pasangan perkawinan antar budaya suku Pakistan –suku Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains (JUPISI), 3(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.63494/jupisi.v3i1.175
Sianturi, C. K., Tangkudung, J. P. M., & Harilama, S. H. (2021). Peranan Komunikasi Antarbudaya dalam Proses Asimilasi Pasangan Kawin Campur Etnis Batak di Kabupaten Luwu Timur Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 3(1), 1–12.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Communicating across cultures (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. C. (2005). Understanding intercultural communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2
Triningtyas, D. A. (2019). Konseling lintas budaya. Jawa Timur: CV. AE Media Grafika.
Wahyuni, A., & Nurman, N. (2019). Dampak Perkawinan Adat Antar Etnis Mandailing dengan Etnis Minangkabau Terhadap Kekerabatan dan Hak Waris Anak di Kabupaten Pasaman. Journal of Civic Education, 2(5), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v2i5.279
Wang, X.-L. (2012). Multilingualism and Family Welfare. In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism: Second Edition (pp. 542–562). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118332382.ch22
Warner Colaner, C., Atkin, A. L., Elkhalid, A., Minniear, M., & Soliz, J. (2023). Communication in interfaith and multiethnic-racial families: Navigating identity and difference in family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(6), 1673–1705. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221137317
Ying, T. Y. (2023). Singing the same tune? Prosodic norming in bilingual Singaporeans. In Multilingual Norms (pp. 173–194).
Yodanis, C., & Lauer, S. (2017). Multiculturalism in interethnic intimate relationships. Families, Relationships and Societies, 6(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674315X14479283205364
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sitti Murni Kaddi, Fadhliah, Muh. Zainuddin Badollahi, Roman Rezki Utama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.