From 20th century weddings to quarantine weddings: Old and new approaches to analyzing rituals

Judit Balatonyi

doi:10.15575/jcrt.383

From 20th century weddings to quarantine weddings: Old and new approaches to analyzing rituals

Authors

Judit Balatonyi University of Pecs, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jcrt.383

Keywords:

Covid–19 pandemic, marriage rituals, marriage transformations, meanings of tradition

Abstract

Although ethnographic studies of marriage in 20th century Hungary have reckoned with the impact of socio-cultural transformations on getting married, nonetheless they primarily emphasized the normative aspects and permanence of the ritual; they stressed that marriage preserved “traditions”, or even that folk tradition acting as an ethno-folk-national “matrix” preserved and maintained the wedding rituals. Even if they touched upon the transformation of rituals, they primarily highlighted the modernization, simplification, fragmentation of the act of getting married and the marginalization of original meanings, traditional community norms, ideologies, and roles. Could this static and normative image depicting marriage not as a changing but rather as a decaying, diminished institution be in fact the result and consequence of an epistemological tradition, a methodological-theoretical focus that hides the process of the emergence of a new conception of marriage based on free choice, improvisation and on the idea of the individual breaking free of the yoke of normative traditions? The purpose of my paper is twofold. I will examine what the earlier Hungarian ethnographic studies understood by constancy, normativity, traditional or modern of wedding rituals. On the other hand, based on my current anthropological research (2019-2022, during the Covid–2019 pandemic) I will analyze the contemporary marriage rituals: and using the results of my research I also undertake a different kind of rereading of 20th century ethnographic descriptions. My paper based on the results of my digital anthropological research carried out between 2019 and 2022 (online questionnaires, digital ethnography, and in-depth interviews). I argue that the earlier Hungarian ethnographic approaches to weddings at the time may have been significantly influenced by prevailing Hungarian and international normative conceptualizations and theories of tradition and modernity.

References

Anttonen, P. (2005). Tradition through Modernity: Postmodernism and the Nation-State in Folklore Scholarship. Finnish Literature Society. https://doi.org/10.21435/sff.15

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306

Balázs, L. (1994). Az én első tisztességes napom: Párválasztás és lakodalom Csíkszentdomokoson [My First Honorable Day: Pair Choosing and Wedding in Csíkszentdomokos]. Gutenberg Books SRL.

Bausinger, H. (2004). A néprajzi jelenkutatás elvei [Principles of Ethnographic Present-Research]. In F. Zoltán & F. Zsófia (Eds.), Korunk és tárgyaink – elmélet és módszer. Fordításgyűjtemény. (MaDok-füzetek 2) (pp. 9–16). Néprajzi Múzeum.

Boden, S. (2003). Introduction: Consumerism, Romance and the Wedding Experience. In Consumerism, Romance and the Wedding Experience (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230005648_1

Briggs, C. L. (1996). The Politics of Discursive Authority in Research on the “Invention of Tradition”. Cultural Anthropology, 11(4), 435–469. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1996.11.4.02a00020

Carter, J., & Duncan, S. (2017). Wedding paradoxes: individualized conformity and the ‘perfect day’. The Sociological Review, 65(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12366

Carter, J., & Duncan, S. (2018). Reinventing Couples: Tradition, Agency and Bricolage. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58961-3_2

Chapple, E. D., & Coon, C. S. (1942). Principles of Anthropology. Henry Holt and Co.

Charsley, S. (2002). Wedding Cakes and Cultural History. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203404140

Cleuziou, J., & McBrien, J. (2021). Marriage quandaries in Central Asia. Oriente Moderno, 100(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340246

Durkheim, É. (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. Macmillan Publishers.

Edit, C. S. (1981). A palóc lakodalmi kalácsok [The Palóc Wedding Cake]. Ethnographia, XCII(2–3), 350–373.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford university press.

Goode, W. J. (1963). World Revolution and Family Patterns. Free Press.

Gordon, D. M., Edwards, R., & Reich, M. (1982). Segmented work, divided workers (Vol. 19820). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Györgyi, E. (1987). Lakodalom [Wedding]. In O. Gyula (Ed.), Magyar Néprajzi Lexikon III (pp. 397–400). Akadémia Kiadó.

Halász, P. (2015). Cserefának füstje hozta ki könnyveme. In Néprajzi, tudománytörténeti írások a moldvai magyarokról [Ethnographic and Historiographic Writings on the Hungarians of Moldavia] (pp. 209–218). Kriza János Néprajzi.

Handler, R., & Linnekin, J. (1984). Tradition, Genuine or Spurious. The Journal of American Folklore, 97(385), 273. https://doi.org/10.2307/540610

Hobswamb, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press.

Hull, K. E., Meier, A., & Ortyl, T. (2010). The Changing Landscape of Love and Marriage. Contexts, 9(2), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2010.9.2.32

Illouz, E. (2012). Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Polity Press.

Isański, J. (2013). Honeymoon as a Rite of Passage: Sociological Analysis of Changes in the Phenomenon. Folia Turistica, XXVIII(2), 109–129.

Keesing, R. M. (1989). Creating the past: Custom and identity in the contemporary Pacific. The Contemporary Pacific, 1(1–2), 19–42.

Keller-Drescher, L. (2014). From Princess Bride to Fashion Queen: Wedding Gowns as a Strategy and Spatial and Physical Staging Act. In Fashionable Queens: Body-Power-Gender (Eva Flicke). Peter Lang GmbH.

Kimport, K. (2012). Remaking the White Wedding? Same-Sex Wedding Photographs’ Challenge to Symbolic Heteronormativity. Gender & Society, 26(6), 874–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212449902

Lewis, J. L. (2013). The Anthropology of Cultural Performance. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137342386

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1975). Collected works. International Publishers.

Melinda, S. (2019). A magyar lakodalom változása Ördöngösfüzesen (1930–2017) [Changes in Hungarian Weddings in Ördöngösfüzes (1930–2017)] (Dissertationes Ethnographicæ Transylvanicæ). Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság.

Molnár, I. (1958). A székely lakodalom jelképes süteménye, a „prémes” [The Symbolic Cake of the Székely Wedding, the “prémes”. Néprajzi Közlemények, 3(4), 22−43.

Péter, K. (2008). Házasság a régi Magyarországon, 16–17. század [Marriage in Old Hungary, 16–17th Century]. L’Harmattan.

Redfield, R. (1989). The little community and peasant society and culture. University of Chicago Press.

Shanklin, E. (1981). Two Meanings and Uses of Tradition. Journal of Anthropological Research, 37(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.37.1.3629516

Szabó, A. P. (2010). Menyegzőtől mennyegzőig. Századok, CXLIV(5), 1027–1083.

Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Polity Press.

Vilmos, K. (1991). A folklór határán: A népi írásbeliség verses műfajai Aranyosszéken [On the Border of Folklore: Poetic genres of folkloric literacy in Aranyosszék]. Kriterion Könyvkiadó.

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittick (Eds.)). Bedminster Press.

Worood. (2023). Minimony: A New Trend In Wedding. Worood. https://worood.com/2020/06/02/minimony-a-new-trend-in-wedding/