Women’s Ritual Art and Intergenerational Knowledge: A Visual Ethnography of Jhuti Practices in Bhadrak District, Odisha

Women’s Ritual Art and Intergenerational Knowledge: A Visual Ethnography of Jhuti Practices in Bhadrak District, Odisha

Authors

  • Taranisen Panda Department of Botany, Chandbali College, Odisha
  • Nirlipta Mishra Department of Zoology, Chandbali College, Odisha
  • Asima Ray Government Teachers Training College, Odisha
  • Shaik Rahimuddin Department of Zoology, Chandbali College, Odisha
  • Bikram Pradhan Department of Botany, Chandbali College, Odisha
  • Raj Ballav Mohanty Ex-Reader in Botany, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jcrt.735

Keywords:

Embodied knowledge, intangible cultural heritage, Jhuti, ritual art, visual ethnography

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to document and analyze the contemporary practice of Jhuti, a women-led ritual art in Bhadrak District, Odisha, by examining its visual motifs, ritual functions, intergenerational transmission, and emerging generational shifts. The research investigates how Jhuti operates as a gendered knowledge system that integrates cosmological symbolism, ecological values, and domestic ritual authority. Methodology: The study employs a two-year visual ethnography (2021–2023) combining participant observation, semi-structured interviews with 97 women practitioners, and photographic documentation across seven administrative blocks. Data were analyzed using thematic coding, motif cataloguing, and cross-generational comparison to identify patterns in ritual participation, material use, symbolic repertoire, and transmission modes. Findings: The research documents twenty-eight distinct Jhuti motifs and reveals a structured symbolic repertoire dominated by Lakshmi paduka (95%), lotus (79%), and conch (71%). Ritual participation remains high during major festivals, particularly Manabasa Gurubara (98%). Jhuti knowledge is transmitted primarily through matrilineal teaching (74%), though reliance on observational learning increases among younger women. Significant generational differences emerge: older women emphasize communal-religious meanings and traditional mud-floor contexts, while younger practitioners favor individual-artistic framings, cement/tile surfaces, and digital modes of learning. The ethnographic vignette demonstrates that embodied, tactile correction remains central to skill transmission and cannot be replaced by digital replication. Implications:
The findings highlight urgent needs for heritage preservation strategies that support embodied knowledge transmission, address material-infrastructural constraints in urban settings, and integrate Jhuti into educational and community spaces without detaching it from its ritual cosmology. The study provides evidence to inform policy interventions aligned with UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage framework, emphasizing sustaining living practices rather than aestheticizing them. Originality and Value: This study offers the first systematic visual ethnography of Jhuti in Bhadrak District, providing an empirically grounded motif catalogue, cross-generational analysis, and detailed documentation of embodied teaching practices. By demonstrating Jhuti’s function as a gendered knowledge system situated at the intersection of devotion, ecology, and domestic authority, the research contributes new conceptual and empirical insights to the fields of ritual studies, women’s art traditions, and intangible heritage preservation.

References

Agarwal, R. (2015). Madhubani painting: Women dominated folk art. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(11), 736–738. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/91027232/1-11-40.pdf

Ankyiah, F. (2023). Ritual ecology and Sirigu mural paintings: Interrogating the intersection of art and culture. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v6i4.1121

Appadurai, A. (1986). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Butler, J. (2020). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In Feminist theory reader (pp. 353–361). Routledge.

Cohn, N. (2020). Who Understands Comics? Questioning the Universality of Visual Language Comprehension. London, England: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350156074

Dalmia, Y. (1988). The Painted World of the Warlis: Art and Ritual of the Warli Tribes of Maharashtra. New Delhi, India: Lalit Kala Akademi.

Dash, S. M. (2018). Jhoti - an artistic tradition. Journal of Geriatric Care and Research, 5(1), 40. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/36878549/Journal_of_Geriatric_Care_and_Research_2018_Volume_5_Issue_1

Demori, L. (2019). Corporeal identities, maternal artivism: A new decolonial approach to the study of Latin American women artists. Arts, 8(4), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8040137

Dutta, R. (2024). (Hi)stories in pictures: Use of folk and tribal art forms in two pictorial biographies from India. Literature Compass, 21(7–9), e12768. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12768

Hans, A., & Das, A. (2012). Chitta: The traditional art of Odisha. Odisha Review, 68(10), 35–37. Retrieved from https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2012/May/engpdf/36-38.pdf

Harding, S. G. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Harrison, R. (2020). Heritage Futures: Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices. London, England: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13xps9m

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London, England: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055

Jha, A. (2024). Women as Custodians of Folk Art Traditions in India: Gendered Narratives and Cultural Continuities in Context to Madhubani Art of Bihar. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(7), 1669–1675. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.6279

Kanungo, P., Sethi, N., & Pritam, B. P. (2020). A Policy Framework for the Creative Pattachitra Artisans at the Crossroad of Financial Scarcity and Changing Trends. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.9923

Kanungo, P., Sethi, N., & Pritam, B. P. (2021). Socio-economic Condition, Welfare Schemes, and Occupational Structure of `Pattachitra’ Artisans in Odisha, India. Creative Industries Journal, 14(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2020.1775029

Kapur, G. (1978). Contemporary Indian Artists. Ghaziabad, India: Vikas Publishing House.

Kapur, G. (1997). Women Artists in India: A Celebration of Independence. Oakland, CA: Mills College Art Gallery.

Lewallen, A. E. (2017). Ainu women and indigenous modernity in settler colonial Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 15(18), 5069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1557466017018587

Modak, P., & Rani, P. (2022). Wall and floor art at Jorakath, Jharkhand. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Mumbai, 96(9), 81–88.

Mukhopadhyay, D. (1994). Folk Arts and Social Communication. New Delhi, India: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.

Nagarajan, V. (2018). Feeding a Thousand Souls: Women, Ritual, and Ecology in India -- An Exploration of the Kolam. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195170825.003.0011

Pathy, D. N. (1990). Traditional Painting of Odisha. Bhubaneswar, India: Working Artists Association of Orissa & Jatin Das Centre of Art.

Paulucci, E. M., Tamayo Osorio, C., & Domingues, M. G. (2022). [Between] the Paintings of the Ndebele Houses: [Geo]metries and Ragged Curricula. Acta Scientiae, 24(8), 258–285. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7159

Pillai, G. (2023). The Indian Folk Arts and Crafts: An Exploration of India’s Regional Folk Arts and Crafts. Chennai, India: Notion Press.

Proser, A. (2020). The Art of Impermanence: Japanese Works from the John C. Weber Collection and Mr & Mrs John D. Rockefeller 3rd Collection. Milan, Italy: Officina Libraria.

Sarin, A. (2022). The Kolam Drawing: A Point Lattice System. Design Issues, 38(3), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00690

Sethi, A. (2024). Ritual as Image: Materiality, Social History, and the Gendered Economies of Agrarian Capitalism in Central India. American Ethnologist, 51(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13280

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263

Stefano, M. L., Davis, P., & Corsane, G. (2012). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (Vol. 8). Suffolk: Boydell Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt81mt8

Tripathy, M. (1998). Folk art at the crossroads of tradition and modernity: A study of Patta painting in Orissa. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 29(3), 197–211. Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:28d39d2a-34ab-4ced-8577-217a17316525/files/r2227mq793

UNESCO. (2001). Women and intangible heritage and development. Paris, France. Retrieved from https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/00160-EN.pdf

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Paris, France. Retrieved from https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention

UNESCO. (2023). Intangible cultural heritage of humanity: Women’s ritual arts and ecological traditions. Paris, France: UNESCO Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...