“I’m not gonna answer that”: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Hawley-Zuckerberg Debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jcspi.v3i2.1464Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Debate, Hawley, ZuckerbergAbstract
The widespread use of social media has had a significant impact on digital power dynamics and accountability. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has frequently faced criticism for its social responsibility in addressing the detrimental effects of its platforms. Arguments between Senator Josh Hawley and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg during a US congressional hearing exemplified this tension. This study employs a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach based on Norman Fairclough's model, which has three main dimensions: text analysis, discursive practice analysis, and social practice analysis. This analysis demonstrates how Senator Josh Hawley and Mark Zuckerberg's debate at a US congressional hearing highlighted the tension between technological innovation and Meta-corporate social responsibility. Also, it emphasizes how Zuckerberg's apology lacked concrete steps in response to this issue, as he did not mention compensation for victims or major changes to the platform's algorithm. Hawley utilized hostile speech (aggressive or antagonistic, frequently with the intention of eliciting a negative response) to pressure Zuckerberg to admit Meta's failure to protect users. Ina contrary, Zuckerberg preferred defensive language (respond defensively, frequently in a manner that prevents open dialogue or hinders understanding) to project a positive picture of the corporation.
References
Bartlett III, R. P., & Bubb, R. (2024). Corporate social responsibility through shareholder governance. Southern California Law Review, 97, 417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354220
Chimombo, M., & Roseberry, R. L. (2013). The power of discourse: An introduction to discourse analysis. Routledge.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2021). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.
Chung, S., & Lee, S. (2021). Crisis management and corporate apology: The effects of causal attribution and apology type on publics' cognitive and affective responses. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417735646
Constantina, N., & Irwansyah. (2024). Corporate communication, public relations, and mobility in communication crisis handling in the insurance industry. Gema Wiralodra, 15(1), 247–262.
Curtin, S. C. (2020). State suicide rates among adolescents and young adults aged 10–24: United States, 2000–2018 (National Vital Statistics Reports, 69[11]). National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr69/NVSR-69-11-508.pdf
Di Domenico, G., Sit, J., Ishizaka, A., & Nunan, D. (2021). Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 124, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.037
Douthat, R. (2021, September 28). Instagram is adult entertainment. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/28/opinion/instagram-social-media-children.html
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2014). What is CDA? Language and power twenty-five years on. Language and Power.
Fairclough, N. (2023). Technologization of discourse. In Texts and practices revisited (pp. 27–42). Routledge.
Horwitz, J., Seetharaman, D., & Wells, G. (2021, September 14). Facebook knows Instagram is toxic for teen girls, company documents show. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739
Ingram, D. (2024). Communication, power, and social media: The influence of the network society on contemporary conflict (Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch University.
Ivey-Stephenson, A. Z., Demissie, Z., Crosby, A. E., Stone, D. M., Gaylor, E., Wilkins, N., Lowry, R., & Brown, M. (2020). Suicidal ideation and behaviors among high school students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(Suppl. 1), 47–55. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/su/su6901a6.htm
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y
Keni, K., Dharmawan, P., & Wilson, N. (2021). Pengaruh reputasi perusahaan, kepuasan merek, dan sikap merek terhadap loyalitas pelanggan pada industri penerbangan di Indonesia. DeReMa (Development of Research Management): Jurnal Manajemen, 16(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.19166/derema.v16i1.2743
Khan, A. (2024). The language of power: Discourse analysis and the politics of representation. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 2(1), 22–31. https://llrjournal.com/index.php/11/article/view/31
Kirtley, O. J., Hussey, I., & Marzano, L. (2021). Exposure to and experience of self-harm and self-harm-related content: An exploratory network analysis. Psychiatry Research, 295, 113572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113572
Lawrence, K. (2022). Facebook’s new chapter: Rebranding to Meta. SAGE Business Cases Originals.
Lipschultz, J. H. (2023). Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. Routledge.
Majebi, N. L., & Drakeford, O. M. (2025). Child safety in the digital age: Historical lessons from media regulation and their application to modern cybersecurity policies (Unpublished manuscript).
Malecki, K. M., Keating, J. A., & Safdar, N. (2021). Crisis communication and public perception of COVID-19 risk in the era of social media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa758
Meta Platforms, Inc. (2024). Proxy statement.
Pandey, S. (2024). A comparative rhetorical analysis of Trump and Biden's climate change speeches: Framing strategies in politics. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231225932
Parashar, Y., & Waraich, S. B. (2023). Relationship between social media usage and social anxiety among college students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(4), 2260–2279. https://doi.org/10.25215/1104.210
Peeples, J., & Murphy, M. (2022). Discourse and rhetorical analysis approaches to environment, media, and communication. In The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 50–62). Routledge.
Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2021). Platforms and cultural production. John Wiley & Sons.
Rahman, F., Zanzibar, Z., Yuzar, E., & Sari, D. D. (2024). Gendered power struggles: A critical discourse analysis of restrictive practice in contemporary journalism under Taliban regime. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 35(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v35i1.4418
Raychoudhury, P. (2021, September 26). What our research really says about teen well-being and Instagram. Facebook Newsroom. https://about.fb.com/news/2021/09/research-teen-well-being-and-instagram/
Satyaninrum, I. R., Falimu, P. R., Rumondor, P., Kurniawati, H., & Aziz, A. M. (2023). Promoting mental health in the digital age: Exploring the effects of social media use on psychological well-being. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i6.9
Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025068306386
Sihombing, G. D. (2024). Dampak dari media sosial terhadap sosial-budaya di masyarakat. Sinar Kasih: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat, 2(1), 199–208.
Solihin, O. (2021). Implementasi big data pada sosial media sebagai strategi komunikasi krisis pemerintah. Common: Jurnal Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP Unikom, 5(1), 56–66.
Syam, A. P., & Kurnia. (2024). Pengaruh permohonan maaf sebagai bentuk komunikasi krisis terhadap reputasi perusahaan. JURIHUM: Jurnal Inovasi dan Humaniora, 1(5), 742–753. https://jurnalmahasiswa.com/index.php/Jurihum/article/view/841
Thompson, D. (2021, September 17). Social media is attention alcohol. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/social-media-attention-alcohol-booze-instagram-twitter/620101/
Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics: Towards critical epistemic discourse analysis. In Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 27–64). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2007). Critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Woo, E. (2021, October 5). Teenage girls say Instagram’s mental health impacts are no surprise. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/05/technology/teenage-girls-instagram.html
Xu, Q. A., Chang, V., & Jayne, C. (2022). A systematic review of social media-based sentiment analysis: Emerging trends and challenges. Decision Analytics Journal, 3, 100073.
Yuzar, E., Rahman, F., Sari, D. D., & Zanzibar, Z. (2023). Unmasking gendered language patterns in social media discourse. Saree: Research in Gender Studies, 5(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.47766/saree.v5i2.1822
Zurriyati, Rahman, F., & Alaqad, M. H. (2023). Language and power: How news media construct a biased structure of information in public discourse during the presidential election. Malikussaleh Social and Political Reviews, 4(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.29103/mspr.v4i1.11031
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadhlur Rahman, Rahma Nuzulia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.