Sic Semper Tyrannis the Philosophy of Law and the Right to Fight Tyranny
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jcspi.v3i2.2918Keywords:
Tyrannicide, Philosophy of Law, Natural Law, Tyranny, Resistance RightsAbstract
This essay explores the philosophical underpinnings of the right to kill a tyrant within the framework of legal philosophy, examining its ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions. The discussion delineates major schools of legal philosophy—natural law (Grotius, Cicero), positive law (Aquinas, Bentham, Austin, Hart), utilitarian law (Hume, Bentham, Mill, Sidgwick), Marxist law (Marx, Engels), historical school (Montesquieu, Hugo, Savigny), sociological jurisprudence (Jhering, Gerber), and realist jurisprudence (Holmes, Llewellyn, Morgenthau)—while selectively employing all except positivist and realist approaches. Natural law, decoupled from divine origins by Grotius, prioritizes inherent human rights, whereas utilitarianism evaluates actions by their promotion of happiness, critiqued by Constant for subordinating principle to outcome. Tyrannicide evolves from class-based resistance in feudal societies to a democratic imperative in modernity, rooted in natural rights. The author laments the absence of "tyrant" definitions in contemporary constitutions (e.g., Ukrainian, U.S., French and etc.), viewing it as enabling elite manipulation. Advocating legislative reforms to permit tyrannicide, the paper warns against nihilism while affirming life's value, favoring imprisonment over execution in liberal states. Drawing on Boesche and Kelsen, it portrays justice as relativistic yet essential for democracy, urging ongoing discourse to safeguard freedoms.
References
Apollonov, A. V. (2018). “Etsi Deus non daretur” (“As if God did not exist”): Hugo Grotius and scholastic theology. Bulletin of the St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University. Series I: Theology, Philosophy, Religious Studies, 77, 63–71. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etsi-deus-non-daretur-kak-esli-by-boga-ne-bylo-gugo-grotsiy-i-sholasticheskaya-teologiya
Aristotle. (1983). Works (Vol. 4). Mysl.
Bailly, A. (1935). Dictionnaire grec–français. Hachette.
Berve, H. (1997). Tyrants of Greece. Phoenix Press.
Blerk, N. (2018). The emergence of law in ancient Egypt: The role of Ma’at. Fundamina, 24(1), 60–88.
Boesche, R. (2010). Theories of tyranny: From Plato to Arendt. Penn State University Press.
Brincat, S. (2008). ‘Death to tyrants’: The political philosophy of tyrannicide—Part I. Journal of International Political Theory, 4(2), 212–240.
Constant, B. (1861). Cours de politique constitutionnelle, ou collection des ouvrages publiés sur le gouvernement représentatif (Vol. 1). Guillaumin.
Correlation between philosophy and theory of state and law. (2021). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 39(5), 1–7. https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/eea/article/view/4797
Estermann, J. (2012). Der Kampf ums Recht. LIT Verlag Münster.
Fischer, J. (2017). Studien zur antiken Religionsgeschichte. Kraków.
French Constitutional Council. (1793). Constitution of June 24, 1793. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/les-constitutions-dans-l-histoire/constitution-du-24-juin-1793
Fuller, L. L. (1934). American legal realism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 82(5), 429–462.
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany]. (1949). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/GG.pdf
Hart, H. L. A. (2017). Philosophy and language of law. Kanon.
Hugo, G. (1819). Lehrbuch des Naturrechts, als einer Philosophie des positiven Rechts, besonders des Privatrechts. Mylius.
Hunt, A. (2017). Marxist theory of law. In A companion to philosophy of law and legal theory. Blackwell. https://legalform.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/hunt-marxist-theory-of-law.pdf
Idraaqie, Z. (1993). Hugo Grotius and natural law: A reinterpretation. The Political Science Reviewer, 23, 370–402.
Ihering, R. von. (1874). Der Kampf ums Recht.
Kelsen, H. (2001). Qué es la justicia? In Lecturas de filosofía del derecho (pp. 3–44). https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/12/5684/3.pdf
Lewis, S. (2019, July 30). Tyranny. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/tyranny
Locke, J. (1988). Works (Vol. 3). Mysl.
Marat, J.-P. (1793, January 23). The execution of the tyrant. Journal de la République Française, No. 105. https://www.marxists.org/history/france/revolution/marat/1793/tyrant.htm
Plamenatz, J. P., & Duignan, B. (2022, September 15). Jeremy Bentham. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jeremy-Bentham
Plato. (1990). Collected works (Vol. 1). Mysl.
Polybius. (2010). The histories (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford University Press. https://theswissbay.ch/pdf/Books/Ancient%20history/Polybius%20-%20The%20Histories%20-%20Robin%20Waterfield.pdf
Radbruch, G. (2004). Philosophy of law. International Relations.
Raboker, N. (2019). The Israeli legal system. https://mishpativri.org.il/researches/hozim18.htm
Saltanov, M. (2016). Zur Frage der Begründung für äußere Legitimität des Staates [Justification issue of external legitimacy of the state]. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias.
Strauss, L. (2006). Natural right and history. St. Petersburg University Press.
Stross, C. (2018). The labyrinth index. Tor Books.
Swartz, N. P. (2010). Thomas Aquinas: On law, tyranny and resistance. Acta Theologica, 30(1), 145–157.
Thomas Aquinas. (n.d.). On law, tyranny, and resistance.
The English Bill of Rights. (1689). https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~rkeyser/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/English-Bill-of-Rights1.pdf
The Constitution of Spain. (1978). https://www.lecturafacil.net/media/resources/CONSTITUCION_ESPA%C3%91OLA_LECTURA_FACIL.pdf
The Constitution of the French Republic. (1958). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/constitution/constitution.pdf
The Constitution of the Italian Republic. (1947). https://www.cortecostituzionale.it/documenti/download/pdf/Costituzione_della_Repubblica_italiana.pdf
The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. (2018). https://www.denederlandsegrondwet.nl
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. (1996). https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996
The Constitution of Ukraine. (2021). https://ccu.gov.ua/sites/default/files/commemorative_constitution_2021.pdf
The Constitution of the United Kingdom. (1991). https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2014/01/the-constitution-of-the-united-kingdom_1991-2014_1420.pdf
The Constitution of the United States of America. (1789). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-1992-6.pdf
Weber, M. (1921). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (Vol. 3). J. C. B. Mohr.
Weber, M. (1965). The sociology of religion. Methuen.
Welch, C. B. (2012). ‘Anti-Benthamism’: Utilitarianism and the French liberal tradition. In R. Geenens & H. Rosenblatt (Eds.), French liberalism from Montesquieu to the present day (pp. 134–151). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael Yurievich Kuznetsov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.