The Use of Rarangkén Ngalogat at Miftahul Huda Islamic Boarding School in Tasikmalaya: Charles Sanders Peirce's Semiotic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/lughaat.v2i1.2316Keywords:
Semiotics, Charles Sanders Peirce, Rarangkén NgalogatAbstract
This study aims to identify the meaning of symbols used in the learning activities of students at Salafi Islamic boarding schools and to understand the application known as Rarangkén ngalogat. Rarangkén ngalogat is a symbol used exclusively by Islamic boarding schools in West Java. This research uses an analytical description method with an interactive analysis model. The approach used was qualitative descriptive. Data collection methods used were interviews, observations, and surveys. This study aimed to uncover the semiosis of rarangken ngalogat using Pierce’s semiosis theory and its use at the Miftahul Huda Islamic boarding school in Tasikmalaya. The theoretical framework of this study is based on Charles Sanders Peirce's semiotic theory, which proposes a trichotomy (representamen, object, and interpretant). The results show that the semiosis of rarangkén ngalogat at the Miftahul Huda Islamic boarding school leads to the sciences of balaghah, manṭiq, naḥw, and the addition of the word ngalogat. Rarangkén ngalogat is practiced during learning activities such as sorogan, bandongan, balagan, and pasaran in accordance with the ibtidā'i, thānawiy, and ma’ḥad ‘āliy levels. The Rarangken ngalogat is rarely used at the elementary level, and translations are sometimes written in Pegon script in classical texts. At the thānawiy level, the rarangken ngalogat becomes more visible and is frequently used, emphasizing its role in improving comprehension. This contrast with the Ma'had 'āliy level, where it is rarely used, underscores its importance. The use of rarangken ngalogat is very beneficial for students because it facilitates their understanding when reading the text.
References
Christomy, T. (2010). Semiotika Budaya. (T. Christomy & U. Yuwono, Eds.) (10th ed.). Depok: PPKB.
Dillistone, F. W. (2002). The Power Of Symbol. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Fakundus, Y. (2015). Animal Symbolicum Menurut Ernst Cassirer. Universitas Katolik Widiya Mandala.
Gusmail, S. (2018). Properti Tari Waktu Dalam Lipatan: Analisis Semiotika Melalui Pendekatan Charles Sanders Peirce. Jurnal Puitika, 14(1).
Hoed, B. H. (2014). Semiotik & Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Depok: Komunitas Bambu.
Neuman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Seventh Edition. Assex: Pearson Education Limited.
Nurrachman, D. (2017). Teks Sastra Dalam Perspektif Semiotika Pragmatis Charles Sanders Peirce. Jurnal Al-Tsaqafa, 14(01).
Rochman, I. (2003). Simbolisme Agama Dalam Politik Islam. Jurnal Filsafat, 1(33).
Sari, D. L. (2012). Analisis Semiotika Logo Ades.
Sobur, A. (2013). Semiotika Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sulastri, & Ronidin. (2014). Fenomena Bahasa Baliho Sebagai Identitas Diri Tokoh Cerminan Karakter Budaya: Kajian Semiotika. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 13(1).
Taufiq, Wi. (2016). Semiotika: Untuk Kajian Sastra dan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Yrama WIdya.
Vera, N. (2014). Semiotika dalam Riset Komunikasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wihandani Wihandani, Wildan Taufiq, Hendar Riyadi, Eghy Farhan Nugraha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


