Digital Transformation: Digitising Witness Statements in South African Policing in Alignment with Religious Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kjrt.v2i1.646Keywords:
Digitisation, Performance, Policing, Religious Principles, Witness StatementsAbstract
The utilisation of new technologies towards supporting effective and accountable policing is increasingly dependent on e-government development and other technological advancements. England and Wales have long moved from paper witness statements to digitally recorded statements, known as Digital Witness Statements (DWS). DWS refers to the digital capture, representation, and storage of the information needed for its use as an evidential witness statement in courts in England and Wales. This paper presents a prototype system that could be employed in the South African policing context, aligning with religious principles to ensure cultural sensitivity and ethical considerations. The aim of this study was to create awareness that digitisation has been an efficient method of capturing witness statements in the European policing context. Additionally, this study aimed to highlight the status quo of taking indigenous witness statements in South Africa. The objective was to explore the phenomenon of taking indigenous witness statements and to establish the South African Police Service (SAPS) members’ perceptions of the current methods. The study also examined how incorporating religious principles can enhance the acceptance and effectiveness of these digital methods within diverse communities. Thematic content analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, and measures of trustworthiness were applied. Three dominant themes—“skills,” “resources,” and “duration”—emerged. The Theory of Performance (ToP) was used, and results indicated that SAPS members identified resources as a barrier to their performance. Integrating religious principles into the digitisation process may address some cultural barriers, fostering a more inclusive and respectful approach to modernising witness statement collection.
References
J. T. Mofokeng, “The apple does not fall far from the tree: Can society corrupt police officials?,” International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 150–164, 2016.
N. I. Zikalala, J. Mofokeng, E. Zenzile, and M. M. Motseki, “Overcoming language barriers: An exploration of the police perceptions of the digitisation of witness statements in South Africa,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 517–529, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i4.2463.
K. Andriushchenko et al., “Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation,” Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 2255, 2020.
S. Kraus, P. Jones, N. Kailer, A. Weinmann, N. Chaparro-Banegas, and N. Roig-Tierno, “Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 215824402110475, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211047576.
J. Donoghue, “The Rise of Digital Justice: Courtroom Technology, Public Participation and Access to Justice,” Mod Law Rev, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 995–1025, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12300.
G. Taylor, L. Simpson, and V. Sidorova, “The digital policing journey: From concept to reality realising the benefits of transformative technology,” in Technical Report Deloitte, 2015.
K. Schwab, The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Currency, 2017.
N. H. M. Van Dam, “The 4th Industrial Revolution & the Future of Jobs,” Bookboon. Retrieved October, vol. 13, no. 2018, pp. 1071–1084, 2017.
L. Caruso, “Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes?,” AI Soc, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 379–392, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00146-017-0736-1.
S. Balkaran, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution-its impact on the South African public sector,” Retrieved on July, vol. 14, p. 2021, 2017.
M. M. Mtotywa, M. Moitse, and M. A. Seabi, “South African citizens’ self-assessed knowledge about the fourth industrial revolution,” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1476–1485, 2022.
South African Police Service, “Strategic Objectives Technical Indicator Descriptions 2014/2019 (Version 1.0),” 2018. Accessed: Jun. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.saps.gov.za/about/stratframework/strategic_plan/2014_2019/saps_technical_desc_strategic_2014_2019.pdf
South African Government, “MEC Albert Fritz on e-docket software not being effectively used by SAPS and Courts,” South African Government. Accessed: Jun. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.za/news/media-statements/mec-albert-fritz-e-docket-software-not-being-effectively-used-saps-and-courts
L. Swales, “An analysis of the regulatory environment governing hearsay electronic evidence in South Africa: suggestions for reform–part two,” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, vol. 21, no. 1, 2018.
Y. Dandurand and K. Farr, A review of selected witness protection programs. Public Safety Canada, 2012.
M. K. Ralarala, “Transpreters’ translations of complainants’ narratives as evidence: whose version goes to court?,” The Translator, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 377–395, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/13556509.2014.934002.
K. Moonsamy, “Analysis on the administration and governance of the South African case docket,” 2018.
S. Holdaway, “The re-professionalization of the police in England and Wales,” Criminology & Criminal Justice, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 588–604, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1748895817690214.
A. McCallum, “Digital Policing Strategy 2017 - 2020,” London, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Jun. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.met.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/downloads/force-content/met/about-us/one-met-digital-policing-strategy-2017-2020.pdf
G. Taylor, L. Simpson, and V. Sidorova, “The digital policing journey: From concept to reality realising the benefits of transformative technology,” in Technical Report Deloitte, 2015.
P. Filby, “Digital Witness Statement – Business Process,” Surrey, Apr. 2014.
L. Abrahams and M. Burke, “Structuring SA’s digital government: the road not traveled?,” BussinessDay. Accessed: Jun. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2019-05-22-structuring-sas-digital-government-the-road-not-traveled/
K. Breckenridge, “3 The elusive panopticon: The HANIS project and the politics of standards in South Africa,” in Playing the Identity Card, Routledge, 2013, pp. 39–56.
K. Moonsamy, “Analysis on the administration and governance of the South African case docket,” 2018.
A. L. Legodi and M. A. Dikotla, “E-docket system for improved administration and justice delivery in selected Limpopo province police stations,” Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, vol. 55, pp. 27–40, 2022.
S. Mkhwanazi, “MPs pressure cops to implement e-docket system and speed up prosecutions,” IOL. Accessed: Jun. 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/mps-pressure-cops-to-implement-e-docket-system-and-speed-up-prosecutions-18925165
J. T. Mofokeng and I. De Vries, “Anti-fraud training in the South African Police Service (SAPS): A strategic perspective,” International journal of social sciences and humanity studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 84–102, 2016.
J. M. Modise, “Explore and Propose a Comprehensive Framework for Building an Ideal South African Police Service (SAPS), in Addressing Historical Challenges, Contemporary Realities, and Future Aspirations,” Advances in Social Sciences and Management, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2024.
G. Taylor, L. Simpson, and V. Sidorova, “The digital policing journey: From concept to reality realising the benefits of transformative technology,” in Technical Report Deloitte, 2015.
L. Hagen, T. E. Keller, X. Yerden, and L. F. Luna-Reyes, “Open data visualizations and analytics as tools for policy-making,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101387, 2019.
A. Job, “Advanced technology: making SA safer,” Motorola Solutions. Accessed: Jun. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.itweb.co.za/article/advanced-technology-making-sa-safer/raYAyqodAgBvJ38N
K. Strom, “Research on the impact of technology on policing strategy in the 21st century, final report,” Washington DC: US Department of Justice, 2017.
Government, “Here’s how many police officers there are in South Africa – and what they earn,” BusinessTech. Accessed: Jun. 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/579116/heres-how-many-police-officers-there-are-in-south-africa-and-what-they-earn/
M. De Bruyn, “The protection of personal information (POPI) act: impact on South Africa,” 2014.
M. Lungu, “The coding manual for qualitative researchers,” American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 232–237, 2022.
D. Wicks, “The coding manual for qualitative researchers,” Qualitative research in organizations and management: an international journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 169–170, 2017.
C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts.,” International Journal of higher education, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 26–41, 2017.
L. Swales, “The regulation of electronic signatures: time for review and amendment,” S Afr Law J, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 257–270, 2015.
L. Swales, “An analysis of the regulatory environment governing electronic evidence in South Africa: suggestions for reform,” 2019.
D. Elger, “Theory of performance,” Faculty guidebook: A comprehensive tool for improving faculty performance, vol. 4, pp. 19–22, 2007.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nomsa Ingrid Zikalala, Jacob Tseko Mofokeng, Moses Morero Motseki, Enoch Zenzile
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.