Peer Review

Pupujian applies a double-blind peer review system, in which both the identities of the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process. Each submitted manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who have expertise in the relevant subject area.

Reviewers assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:

• Relevance to the journal’s scope

• Originality and scholarly contribution

• Methodological soundness

• Clarity of presentation and argumentation

• Quality of language and structure

• Compliance with ethical publishing standards

Based on the review, one of the following editorial decisions will be made:

• Accepted without revisions

• Accepted with minor or major revisions

• Rejected

Reviewers are expected to provide constructive and objective feedback to help improve the quality of the manuscript. All reviews and communications are treated as confidential and are used solely for the purpose of evaluating the manuscript.

Final decisions on publication are made by the editor, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations.