Religion as an Ethical Pillar in Asset Management and Public Services in the Digital Era in Sumedang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/rpj.v3i2.2305Keywords:
Religion, Ethics, Asset Management, Public Service, Digital EraAbstract
Research Problem: Pervasive gaps in ethical governance undermine asset management and digital public service delivery at the local level. In Sumedang Regency, the extent to which religious values can function as an ethical pillar to strengthen accountability, transparency, and public trust remains underexamined.
Research Purposes: (1) To analyze how religious ethics inform the governance of regional assets and digital public services in Sumedang Regency; (2) to assess their contribution to accountability, transparency, and community trust; and (3) to identify practical pathways for embedding religious values into local government operations.
Research Methods: A qualitative descriptive design combining document/policy review, semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders, and analysis of secondary data. Data were thematically coded to trace linkages between explicit religious values (e.g., honesty, responsibility, fairness) and observed governance practices and outcomes.
Results and Discussion: Findings indicate that the explicit integration of religious values functions as a moral baseline for decision-making in asset registration, utilization, and oversight, and for the design and delivery of digital public services. Reported effects include clearer audit trails, more consistent rule adherence, and improved responsiveness in service workflows—factors associated with higher perceived accountability and transparency. However, impacts are uneven and contingent on leadership commitment, codification in SOPs, staff capacity, and the alignment of digital systems with ethical safeguards (e.g., auditability and privacy).
Research Implications and Contributions: Policy-wise, the study recommends formalizing value-based codes of conduct within asset and service SOPs, embedding ethics checks in SPBE/digital platforms (e.g., audit trails, disclosure dashboards), and institutionalizing training and public feedback loops. Practically, it offers a context-sensitive framework for operationalizing religious values in local e-governance. Academically, it contributes to the literature on ethical digital governance by demonstrating how religiosity—conceptualized as actionable virtues—can complement modern technological controls to enhance public trust and the effective use of public assets.
References
Abdurrahman, Z. (2025). Islamic ethical governance: An integrated model for corruption prevention. Kurva: Journal of Nurscience Institute.
Anshar, S. (2025). Ethics in public administration as the foundation of good governance. EJurnal Politik dan Pemerintahan.
Aprilia, E. (2023). Religiosity reduces corruption intention in civil servants. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Psychology.
Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Sumedang. (n.d.). SIAPDOL – Sistem Aplikasi Pajak Daerah Online.
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8204-5
Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693003
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
BPK Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Barat. (n.d.). Opini dan tindak lanjut LKPD kabupaten/kota di Jawa Barat.
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Dewi, D. S. K. (2020). Bringing religious value to public service motivation. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 1–16.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
Hidayat, A. (2025). Moral courage and bureaucratic ethics in Indonesian public organizations. Jurnal Etika Administrasi Publik.
Islami, H. (2022). The influence of Islamic work ethics on prosocial behaviors in organizations. Advances in Islamic Finance, Economics and Business, 2(1), 1–12.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2024). Perubahan atas Permendagri Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah.
Kim, S. (2012). Does person–organization fit matter in the public sector? Testing the mediating effect of person–organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02572.x
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Ladhari, R. (2009). Service quality, emotional satisfaction, and behavioural intentions. Managing Service Quality, 19(3), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520910955320
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Luhuringbudi, T. (2025). Islamic ethics and modern governance. Jurnal Al-Wasatiyah.
Meijer, A., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429531
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of co-production. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
Novianto, N. (2023). Models of digital transformation in the public sector. Policy & Governance Review.
Nurhidayat, N., dkk. (2024). Analysis of the E-Government Development Index in Indonesia 2016–2022. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 8(2), 376–549.
OECD. (2020). Digital Government Index 2019: Results and key messages. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4de257bd-en
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2018/2021). Masterplan/Peraturan Bupati transformasi digital menuju Sumedang Happy Digital Region.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2021, April 27). BPK berikan catatan-catatan atas LKPD Sumedang.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2022, Maret 21). Layanan pembayaran pajak berbasis aplikasi.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2023). Catatan atas Laporan Keuangan (CaLK) Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang Tahun Anggaran 2022.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2024). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Sumedang Nomor 4 Tahun 2024 tentang Transformasi Digital (Abstrak).
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2025, Mei). Sumedang raih opini WTP dari BPK ke-11 kali beruntun.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP).
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara/Daerah.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas PP 27/2014 tentang Pengelolaan BMN/BMD.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
PPID Kabupaten Sumedang. (n.d.). Visi & misi Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang (Sumedang SIMPATI).
Prokopim Banda Aceh. (2025, Juni 13). Banda Aceh dan Sumedang perkuat kolaborasi e-government.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Qorny, F. N. (2022). Fraud mitigation by embodying maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Journal of Accounting and Investment.
Rajab, H. (2024). Ethical governance in public service: An Islamic perspective. International Journal of Legal Studies.
Rosidin, R. (n.d.). Religiusitas birokrasi dan kepatuhan etis aparatur. Jurnal Administrasi Publik.
Sarif, S. (2020). Islamic work ethics and organizational citizenship behaviour: A review. International Journal of Ethics and Systems.
SIAPDOL. (n.d.). Dashboard target & realisasi penerimaan pajak daerah.
Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200205
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
UN DESA. (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024. United Nations.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Website Resmi Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumedang. (2024, Januari 25). Gandeng PT INTI untuk wujudkan Sumedang Smart City.
Wijaya, A. N. B. (2023). Digital innovations for open government in Sumedang Regency. Media Pustaka, 22(2), 93–104.
Widodo, J. (2017). Islamic work ethics and public services performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 2(1), 45–58.
Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2024). Religiosity, spirituality, and job performance among local government employees. Journal of Governance, 9(1), 1–12.
Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Zulyadi, M. (2022). Religious values and integrity in public sector governance. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 19(2), 101–114.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fepi Febianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.