Studi Komparatif Tindak Pidana Aborsi dalam Hukum Pidana Thailand dan Hukum Pidana Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jaa.v3i1.1469Keywords:
Hukum Pidana Islam, Thailand, Tindak PidanaAbstract
Abstrak: Aborsi di Thailand telah menjadi persoalan serius karena maraknya praktik meskipun secara hukum dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana. Kondisi ini menimbulkan problem medis, sosial, dan hukum yang perlu dianalisis lebih dalam. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah tindak pidana aborsi dalam hukum pidana Thailand dan hukum pidana Islam serta membandingkan persamaan dan perbedaannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan studi komparatif, berbasis data kepustakaan yang mencakup sumber primer (Thailand Criminal Code, al-Qur’an, dan Hadis) serta sumber sekunder (buku dan jurnal). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan keduanya sama-sama memperbolehkan aborsi karena alasan medis untuk menghindari mudarat, namun berbeda dalam batas usia kandungan dan jenis sanksi. Kebaruan penelitian ini adalah fokus pada perbandingan normatif antara hukum pidana Thailand dan hukum pidana Islam. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam memperkaya literatur hukum komparatif dan memberikan perspektif baru bagi upaya perlindungan hak hidup janin dan ibu.
Kata Kunci: Hukum pidana Islam, Thailand, tindak pidana
Abstrak: Abortion in Thailand has become a serious issue due to its widespread practice despite being classified as a criminal offense. This situation raises medical, social, and legal problems that need to be analyzed in depth. This study aims to examine the criminal offense of abortion in Thai criminal law and Islamic criminal law and to compare their similarities and differences. The method used is qualitative research with a normative juridical and comparative study approach, based on library data covering primary sources (Thailand Criminal Code, al-Qur'an, and Hadith) and secondary sources (books and journals). The results show that both allow abortion for medical reasons to avoid harm, but differ in terms of gestational age limits and types of sanctions. The novelty of this study is its focus on a normative comparison between Thai criminal law and Islamic criminal law. This study contributes to enriching comparative legal literature and provides a new perspective on efforts to protect the right to life of the fetus and the mother.
Kata Kunci: Islamic criminal law, Thailand, criminal acts
References
Afiati, Afa, Olivia Sulistya Maspufa, dan Nesya Ekaputri. “Abortion in the Perspective of Ahkam Verses/Hadith and Health Law.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Madzhab 5, no. 1 (2024): 89–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v5i1.39284.
Benuf, Kornelius, dan Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (1 April 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504.
Bhumibol Adulyajed. Thai Penal Code Thai Criminal Law (2003).
Chinthakanan, Orawee, Roger W. Rochat, Nuntana Morakote, dan Somsak Chaovisitseree. “The Hidden Problems of Illegal Abortions in Thailand.” BSCM: Biomedical Sciences and Clinical Medicine 53, no. 4 (2014): 187–91. https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/CMMJ/10972628.pdf.
Chudech Pathawi. “Pelajari Undang-Undang Aborsi Dan Hak-Hak Perempuan Berdasarkan Hukum Thailand.” Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Western, Humaniora Dan Ilmu Sosial 7, no. 3 (2021): 23–35. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/WTURJ/article/view/256205.
Chunuan, Sopen, Siriratana Kosunvanna, Wattana Sripotchanart, Jitsai Lawantrakul, Jitti Lawantrakul, Uaiporn Pattrapakdikul, dan Jitranan Somporn. “Characteristics of Abortions in Southern Thailand.” Pacific Rim International Journal Of Nursiny Research 16, no. 2 (2012): 97–112. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/5920/0.
David Tan. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8, no. 8 (2021): 63–78. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i8.2021.2463-2478.
Faqih, Moh. “Studi Komparatif Tindak Pidana Aborsi dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam (Imam Madzhab).” Rechtenstudent 1, no. 2 (11 Februari 2021): 204–13. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v1i2.28.
Hamidah, Nazwa Nuruh, dan Zikran Ammar. “Hukum Abortus Atau Aborsi.” AL-IKTISAR: The Renewal of Islamic Economic Law 2, no. 2 (2021): 9–16. https://jurnal.idaqu.ac.id/index.php/al-ikhtisar/article/view/64.
Hanafi, Muhammad Chirzin Muchlis Muhammad, dan Huzaemah T Yanggo. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: Lajna Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an, 2019.
Hudiyani, Zulfa. “Diskursus Aborsi Dalam Perspektif Fikih Klasik Dan Kontemporer.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam 2, no. 1 (30 Maret 2021): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v2i1.12172.
Leetrakool, Hathaipat, Thanathorn Wonglerttham, Sornchaya Sonthyanonth, dan Jen Sothornwit. “A national survey on Thai medical students’ attitudes towards abortion and their confidence in providing abortion services following the amendment to abortion law.” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X 25 (Maret 2025): 100–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100364.
Maria Ulfah Ansor. Fikih Aborsi (Wacana Penguatan Hak Reproduksi Perempuan). Jakarta: Buku Kompas, 2021.
Mariyati, Mile, Nur Muhammad Kasim, dan Jufryanto Puluhulawa. “Penjatuhan Hukuman Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembuangan Janin Bayi Hasil Aborsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Aufklarung: Jurnal Pendidikan, sosial dan humaniora 3, no. 1 (2023): 56–61. https://www.pijarpemikiran.com/index.php/Aufklarung/article/view/444.
Miranda Damayanti, dan Nurul Fajriyah. “Problems of Abortion Implementation in the Perspective of Indonesia and Thai Criminal Acts.” Legal Brief 13, no. 5 (2024): 1110–18. https://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/download/813/777/6462 .
Pitchaya Luangrattanacharoen. “Pengakhiran Kehamilan: Aborsi Yang Sah Pasal 301 Dan 305 KUHP.” Nitipat Nida Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2022): 35–50. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nitipat/article/view/258942.
PrapapornnTonkaew, Somsak Suthutvoravut, dan Thoranin Sujjaviriyasup. “Knowledge and Opinion of Thai Lawyers Towards Abortion Laws.” RMJ: Ramathibodi Medical Journal 40, no. 4 (2017): 29–38. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ramajournal/article/view/76731.
Rahmawati. “Perbandingan Regulasi Aborsi antara Hukum Indonesia dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 3, no. 1 (2021). https://ejournal.unisbablitar.ac.id/index.php/supremasi/article/view/1443.
Rofiq, Nur, Nur Azizah, Irma Firnanda, M. Wisnu Haikal, dan Dida Oktavian. “ABORSI DALAM PANDANGAN HUKUM ISLAM.” Jurnal Al-Wasith : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam 8, no. 2 (22 November 2023): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.52802/wst.v8i2.642.
Tapanya, Aungwara, dan Wongriantong Thacthapong. “The Problems in Enforcing Abortion Law in Related to Criminal Code Amendment Act (No.28) B.E 2564.” Journal of MCU Haripunchai Review 7, no. 4 (2023): 268–83. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMHR/article/view/aA-018.
Thailand, National Assembly of. Thailand Penal Code Thai Penal Law Book II Title IX Offence Relating to Sexuality (2003). https://www.samuiforsale.com/law-texts/thailand-penal-code.html.
Wattana. “Legalisasi Aborsi: Etika Dan Pembangunan.” Jurnal Proses Peradilan 12, no. 2 (2019): 73–86. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTJS/article/view/1469.
Wijayati, Mufliha. “Aborsi Akibat Kehamilan yang Tak Diinginkan (KTD): Kontestasi Antara Pro-Live dan Pro-Choice.” Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 15, no. 1 (6 April 2017): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v15i1.712.
Yusra, Nelly. “Aborsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama dan Jender 11, no. 1 (2 Juni 2012): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v11i1.496.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Miss Asyron Cheh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
